| Anna
Marshall - 7 March 2006
Another
woman has walked free from an Australian court after murdering her
husband. Not only was it murder, it was, according to the
prosecution, a cold-blooded and calculated execution.
On 30 September 2004, primary school teacher, Claire Margaret
MacDonald, 39, put on a camouflage outfit and rubber gloves, grabbed
her husband's high powered rifle and hid in the bushes near where
the family's Land Rover was parked in a paddock on the couple's
property in Acheron in Victoria, and waited for her husband to
arrive.
She lured him to the spot by telling him the Land Rover's battery
was flat. She loaded five bullets into the magazine and kept a sixth
in her pocket. After about 90 minutes Warren MacDonald came into
view. Clair MacDonald followed him in the rifle's telescopic sights
until he was about 45 metres away. She fired one shot then another
and another until she had fired all five rounds. Warren MacDonald
fell to the ground, struck in the neck, throat and back. She then
took out the sixth bullet from her pocket, loaded it and fired.
As her husband lay bleeding to death on the ground, MacDonald
stood over him and berated him for five minutes, telling him how she
"hated him for making me do this".
MacDonald then tried to cover up her crime by telling police that
a rabbit-shooter had threatened her husband the previous day.
Only when police began questioning her children did MacDonald
change her story and claim she was a battered wife.
"He was hurting my children and he just didn't deserve to
live. I just wanted him out of my life, out of my children's
lives", MacDonald told police.
During the trial in the Victorian Supreme Court, MacDonald's
defence counsel, James Montgomery, told the jury how Mr MacDonald
had "totally dominated" his family, and in particular his
wife, through "physical, verbal, psychological and sexual
intimidation". Unfortunately the allegations could not be
tested in court as Mr MacDonald was not around to refute or
challenge them.
After deliberating for a day, the jury found Claire
Margaret MacDonald not guilty on the charge of murder. Amazingly,
they also
found her not guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. In acquitting Mrs MacDonald, the jury accepted the defence argument that she killed her husband in self-defence.
The MacDonald case is just one of a number of recent cases where
a wife has got away with murdering her husband on the grounds of
being a battered wife. Why bother having women's refuges and a
myriad of taxpayer funded support agencies? Why not just issue
high-powered rifles to all women who claim to be battered?
See also: Women who kill get soft
sentences from feminist-friendly judiciary
Western Australian judge lets
woman walk free after attempting to murder her children
|