Independent commentary to counter the left-leaning, politically correct bigotry of a majority of mainstream journalists.
  Home     Index to Topics    Useful Links      Interesting Statistics        About Us        Support us       Your Say  

Mandatory sentencing in Australia

Anna Marshall - 25 March 2000

The elite versus the majority

Because of biased media reporting, a visitor to Australia might think the majority is against mandatory sentencing. Nothing could be further from the truth. Most Australians support the jailing of repeat offenders. The current debate exposes the huge gulf between the politically correct elite and mainstream Australians.

This is summed up by 2 recent letters to the editor of the West Australian. newspaper. 

No sympathy for juveniles

The debate over the Northern Territory and West Australian juvenile legislation could be laughable if it was not so serious.

The most vociferous opponents appear to be the judiciary. Yet it is the judiciary, through its total disregard for community demands for protection from thieves and thugs, that forced the Government's hand in introducing this three-strikes legislation.

In WA a juvenile can commit 20, 30, 40 or more burglary offences, with devastating results for many of the victims, before being convicted and reaching strike three and receiving a minor jail sentence.

Is it fair that people should live in fear behind barricaded doors and windows, unwilling to set foot outside after dark, while these thugs receive all the sympathy and support of a small army of do-gooders and welfare parasites?

The academic solution is to let thugs run wild in the community while their counterparts spend million of taxpayers' dollars on useless feel-good and reward programs. It is also the academic solution to continually treat those thugs as victims and pander to them, while the real victims are devastated and live in fear.

It is gross negligence to allow these thugs to continue a criminal lifestyle. The soft approach does nothing to help these juveniles, some of whom have been neglected, abused and in some cases encouraged into crime by their families and peers.

The laws are not discriminatory. They apply regardless of race, creed or gender. If there is a high number of Aboriginal youths involved in these crimes, then it is time to address the problems in the communities that are causing this unacceptable behaviour.

Perhaps if those feeding off the Aboriginal industry, and particularly the white parasites, were to redirect their vast taxpayer-supplied funds into improving conditions such as health, education and employment for needy Aboriginal people, it might halt the slide of the youth into the abyss of crime.

These vast sums of money spent on inventing reports on so-called "stolen generations", sorry days and other divisive matters could be put to far better and more constructive use than at present.

So, to all the academics and politicians who have reached their use-by dates, take your interference elsewhere and butt out of WA.

I am reminded of the words Cicero wrote 2000 years ago: "Do not let academics into government with their obtuse theories and unrealistic ideas, otherwise madness will seize mankind." I think, 2000 years later, Cicero was right.

PETER MONEY, Geraldton - February 25, 2000

 

My street is a war zone.

I have lived in a State house in the North-West of Australia for 10 years. In that time my house has been robbed or broken into more than 57 times. On these occasions my garden is damaged, pets killed, lizards and birds killed and vehicles damaged.

 I have had things stolen from next to my head while I have been sleeping. If I water the back garden, the front of the house has to be locked up. While I watch television, thieves come through bedroom windows.

I lock the house up but thieves dismantle windows and anything else moveable. I can’t keep anything of value on the verandahs or in the carport. Paint was stolen from the carport and obscene graffiti sprayed all over the street.

Most houses in the street have the same problem. We have caught 10 per cent of the offenders and in each case the police could not act because they were under age. If we speak to their parents we are abused and called racist.

Young children are assaulted and chased in the street, in their front yards and on the playground (both black and white kids) by gangs of indigenous kids. I find empty purses and credit cards in the back garden that have been stolen from other houses in the street. Clothes are stolen off the clothes line.

A neighbour sells water melons. In daylight, nine young children took them from his trailer and smashed them everywhere. Another neighbour caught them and received a barrage of filthy abuse from kids under 10 years old. That night more came and smashed hundreds of dollars worth of water melons over three streets.

Our street has been like a war zone for 10 years and no one can do anything. Every offender we have caught, seen or chased has been indigenous. When these offenders are 16 or 17 they are going to be criminals, thanks to the do-gooders. Why isn’t there an outcry by the United Nations about what is happening to us law-abiding citizens trying to live normal lives.

The do-gooders are not going to be happy until crime is legalised and we change from a democracy to anarchy and then, when their homes and property are stolen and smashed, they will bring in mandatory sentencing.

The situation is out of control and someone needs to do something about it. If they steal, they have to pay the price. If that depresses them and they want to kill themselves, that is their decision, not ours. We get depressed about our property being stolen, but we don’t kill ourselves. Half the victims in my street are indigenous law-abiding citizens – the same as everybody else.

JOHN KERNOT, Broome. - March 18, 2000

 

Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Australian News Commentary - all rights reserved